Day 1 of the SharePoint Summit in Montreal focused on morning and afternoon workshop sessions. As one of my primary interests is Business Process Management I attended Carmien Owens' presentation on Process Portals within SharePoint. The workshop sessions are 3.5 hours and Carmien did a great job of keeping everyone engaged throughout the workshop.
The best nuggets of information were shared in the first 90 minutes. See how to manually build pages in SharePoint is not particularly exciting but understanding the importance of mapping the business processes and understanding the context of information is far more interesting (at least to me). After all, SharePoint is a great tool but, as Carmen put it, "Using a screwdriver for a chisel is not particularly effective".
There were some interesting observations presented in the workshop session including:
- If time spent on the technical side of the solution (i.e. infrastructure, custom development) exceeds 25% of the total time on a project something is wrong
- Believes 80-85% of the process requirements can be addressed by SharePoint "Out of the Box"
- Gathering requirements for process portals can be broken down into 3 general groups
- What do you do?
- What information do you need to do what you do and who you do it with?
- How would you prove success?
Although one could debate SharePoints ability to address 80-85% of the requirements out of the box I totally agree with Carmen's message. The impact of spending more time on the technology than on the understanding of the business will surely result in not meeting the expectations of the end users or the goals and objectives of the business. We miss the opportunity to find simpler solutions to problems if we believe every problem MUST be solved by custom development. In addition, proving success should be baked into every project plan. Why are we putting all our efforts into portals (or any information technology for that matter) if we cannot prove there is a measurable benefit to the organization?
I would suggest Carmen's illustration of process portals may not meet the value expectations in consideration of usability. The portal examples were not nice on the eyes and appeared, on first observation, to be particularly hard to navigate. However, I love the concept and, as such, give Carmen a high five for an awesome presentation!
